Stepchildren and PIP in Michigan

Written by Steven Matz on . Posted in .

“If my spouse dies, will my children who are his/her stepchildren still be covered by his/her no-fault policy?”

A recent case has answered “yes” to that question under certain circumstances. If the child still lives in the home where the deceased parent and stepparent also lived on the date of the accident, no-fault coverage should still apply to the child. This assumes that the child did not have no-fault coverage of his or her own on the date of the accident, because the child’s own policy would then pay the no-fault benefits.

Will My Child Who Are His/ Her Stepchild Still Be Covered By His/ Her No-Fault Policy?

But the Michigan Court of Appeals has ruled that a stepparent is “related by marriage” to a stepchild (for purposes of this issue, not necessarily under all circumstances) , and that no-fault coverage applies to all family members living in a household who are related either by blood or by marriage. This is a departure from many other states, where stepparents aren’t regarded as being “related by marriage” to the spouse’s children, where death is ruled to end all relationships created by marriage, or by both of these policies.

This issue may arise in a case, for example, in which a parent dies in a crash, and whose children/passengers are injured. If she was driving a vehicle that was owned and insured by her spouse, who is not the father of the children, his auto policy will still provide no-fault benefits to the children for such losses as medical coverage.

Please remember that this is current Michigan law, and could change according to further rulings or legislation at any time. As with any coverage issue, be sure to consult an attorney who works in the automobile negligence field to make sure that the particular facts of your case fit the ruling of the court.

Who Pays PIP for Children of Divorced Parents?

“My ex-spouse and I have shared custody of our children. Whose car insurance covers them if they are in an accident and need medical care?”

The answer to this depends partly upon which parent the child was staying with when the accident happened, and partly on the custody order from the divorce. If one parent has sole legal and physical custody, that parent’s no-fault covers the child’s auto-related expenses (of course, any health insurance the child has also may be involved).

If the parents share legal and physical custody, the insurance comes from whichever parent the child was living with on the day of the accident. The exception is where one parent has primary physical custody. In that case, the insurance comes from the parent with primary custody, no matter where the child was staying on the date of the accident.

If the child happens to be staying with a parent who does not have car insurance and who is not the parent with primary custody, and the child is in someone else’s car when there is an accident, the car insurance will come from sources in this order: the owner of the vehicle the child was in, the driver of that vehicle (if different from the owner), or the Assigned Claims Plan.

Source: 494 Mich 475 (2013)

Read more about who pays for PIP for divorced children here.

Source: Patmon v Nationwide Mutual (unpublished 2014)

Steven Matz

Written By Steven Matz

Steven Matz
Steven J. Matz is a founding shareholder of Matz Injury Law. The firm’s concentration is on personal injury litigation, with an emphasis on traumatic brain injury. Mr. Matz earned a Bachelor of Arts degree with high distinction and highest honors in 1974 from the University of Michigan and a Juris Doctor degree in 1977 from The George Washington University National Law Center. Mr. Matz lectures and publishes in a number of areas, including ethics, marketing, trial tactics, and head injury. Mr. Matz has served on the Michigan Association for Justice Executive Board and currently serves the Michigan Attorney Discipline Board as a Hearing Panel Chairman and Master. He is also a member of the State Bar Committee for Character and Fitness.
array digital logo
© Matz Injury Law.
The maximum contingency fee permitted by law is actually 33 1/3%. Michigan court rules require that the attorney fee be computed on the net sum recovered after deducting all disbursements properly chargeable to the enforcement of the claim.

What does 22not33 mean, exactly?

We can charge 22% while virtually all other injury attorneys charge 33 1/3% because we are very, very, good at obtaining results for our clients. 

We do not spend millions of dollars on television ads; instead, we offer a lower fee to all our clients.  We do not have dozens of lower paid associates handling our work. All our clients are represented by Steven and Jared Matz. Steven Matz started the firm in 1977 and since then has dedicated his life to representing injury victims.  Jared joined the firm in 2016 but grew up listening to stories, discussing theories, and generally learning at the dinner table about how to effectively and compassionately represent injury victims. Jared Matz was literally born to represent individuals involved in motor vehicle crashes.

All of our cases are handled on a contingency fee and all our cases are handled at 22%. Whether the case settles or goes through trial, the fee does not change. While our competitors make excuses as to why they charge so much, we are obtaining results for our clients at a lower fee.

At a typical television advertising law firm, your first call will be handled by a receptionist, who may refer you to an intake person, who will discuss your claim with an intake manager, who then discusses your claim with an associate, who may then report to a partner. You may never speak with the person whose name is at the top of the letterhead. At Matz Injury Law you will always speak with either Steven Matz or Jared Matz.

Lets Talk Close window
WAIT! TAKE ADVANTAGE OF OUR LOWER RATE OF 22%

22 not 33

Other firms charge 33%
We win or you don't pay | 24/7 Team Support | Over 10k Cases Of Experience