Skip to main content

Who Is at Fault in a Self-Driving Car Accident?

Key Takeaways

  • Self-driving car accidents often make fault unclear at the scene, especially when driver assistance systems or automated technology are involved, leaving injured people unsure who may be responsible.
  • In Michigan, fault still matters beyond no-fault benefits, since it can affect personal injury claims, insurance disputes, and whether compensation may be available outside of personal injury protection coverage.
  • Determining responsibility in a self-driving car crash often requires reviewing vehicle data, automation levels, and how Michigan negligence and product liability laws apply to drivers, manufacturers, software developers, or other third parties.
  • Because self-driving accident claims can involve complex technology and insurance challenges, working with a Michigan law firm like Matz Injury Law can help injured people understand their options and respond when insurers delay or dispute claims.
Self-driving red car by traffic light on city street

Self-driving car accidents raise questions many people have never faced before. When a crash involves automation, driver assistance systems, or driverless vehicles, fault is often unclear at the scene. People who suffer injuries might question if the human driver, the vehicle, or the technology company bears the responsibility.

In Michigan, these questions are important. Fault affects insurance coverage, personal injury claims, and whether compensation may be available beyond no-fault benefits. As self-driving technology becomes more common, insurance companies may dispute responsibility more often when automated systems are involved. Understanding how fault is determined is an important first step toward protecting your rights after a serious auto accident.

Matz Injury Law represents individuals injured in car accidents involving advanced vehicle technology across Michigan. Our law firm helps clients understand how liability may apply, what evidence matters, and how to move forward when insurers delay or deny valid claims.

Understanding Federal Regulations for Autonomous Vehicles

In the United States, federal regulation of autonomous cars and other types of vehicles focuses primarily on vehicle safety rather than where or how vehicles are driven. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) oversees autonomous vehicles under existing Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards (FMVSS), which were originally developed for human-driven cars. As a result, some fully autonomous vehicles do not fit neatly within current regulations.

To address this gap, NHTSA allows manufacturers to request exemptions or interpretations showing that an autonomous system can meet or exceed established safety standards. While the NHTSA has issued guidance outlining best practices for safety, cybersecurity, and transparency, most of these frameworks remain voluntary. One important exception is that manufacturers and operators of certain automated driving systems may be required to report qualifying crashes to the federal government under federal reporting rules.

Man sitting in self-driving car with crossed arms

Levels of Automation in Self-Driving Vehicles

Self-driving technology is commonly described using the SAE Levels of Automation, which range from Level 0 to Level 5 and describe how driving responsibilities are shared between the vehicle and the human driver.

  • Level 0: The human driver controls all driving functions.
  • Level 1: Driver assistance supports either steering or braking or acceleration, while the human driver remains fully responsible for controlling the vehicle.
  • Level 2: Partial automation combines steering and speed control, but the driver must actively supervise the vehicle. Tesla Autopilot is an example.
  • Level 3: The self-driving system manages driving under limited conditions, but a human operator must remain ready to intervene.
  • Level 4: High automation allows driverless vehicles to operate in defined areas. Some Waymo vehicles fall into this category.
  • Level 5: Full autonomous driving occurs without a steering wheel or pedals.

Most self-driving technology currently in use operates at Levels 0 through 2.

Common Causes of Self-Driving Car Accidents

Self-driving car crashes often involve a combination of technology issues and human error. Common contributing factors include:

  • Sensor malfunctions involving cameras or radar
  • Artificial intelligence systems misreading road conditions
  • Software errors from third-party developers
  • Improper use or misunderstanding of driver assistance features
  • Human drivers rear-ending vehicles using automated systems
  • Poor road markings or construction zones
  • Manufacturing defects involving vehicle components

Investigations often show that human behavior remains a contributing factor in many crashes involving automated driving systems, particularly when driver supervision is required.

Is the Car or Driver Responsible for a Michigan AV Accident?

In Michigan, responsibility in a self-driving car accident depends on how the vehicle was operating at the time of the crash and how Michigan’s no-fault system applies. While no-fault insurance covers certain benefits regardless of fault, responsibility still matters when injured people pursue compensation beyond those benefits.

Many vehicles marketed as autonomous still require active human supervision. When driver assistance or partial automation systems are in use, Michigan law usually says that the driver should stay alert and be ready to step in. If a crash occurs under those conditions, responsibility may rest with the human driver.

As vehicles move toward higher levels of automation, liability may shift toward product liability claims involving the vehicle manufacturer, software developer, or other parties responsible for the technology. Determining responsibility in Michigan often requires reviewing vehicle data, system limitations, and how state negligence and product liability laws apply to the specific facts of the crash.

Recently in a Car Accident?
Win Compensation and KEEP MORE Money With Effectiveness

How to Distinguish Fault in a Self-Driving Car Accident

Fault in self-driving car accidents is evaluated using a combination of technical evidence and legal standards. Investigators review vehicle data, including event data recorders, system logs, and sensor inputs, to understand how the vehicle operated before and during the crash.

Accident reconstruction experts assess physical evidence and vehicle movement. Attorneys then apply Michigan negligence and product liability laws to identify which parties may be responsible. Multiple parties may share responsibility in many cases, depending on their roles in the events leading up to the crash.

The Human Driver

A human driver may be responsible when driver assistance or partial automation systems require supervision and the driver fails to intervene. Distraction, misuse of automated features, or ignoring system alerts can lead to liability under Michigan negligence law, even when autonomous technology is in use.

The Car Manufacturer

Vehicle manufacturers may face liability when defects in vehicle technology contribute to a crash. These cases often involve Michigan product liability laws related to defective sensors, braking systems, steering components, or failures to meet applicable safety standards. Responsibility depends on the specific vehicle design and how the technology functioned at the time of the crash, which may involve automakers such as Tesla, Volvo, or other manufacturers.

The Software Developer

Software developers may be involved when defects in autonomous driving software contribute to a crash. In Michigan, these claims are typically addressed through product liability principles and may involve software flaws, system failures, or issues related to how automated features were designed or maintained. Responsibility often depends on how the software functioned as part of the overall vehicle system.

Other Potentially Liable Third Parties

Third parties may contribute to self-driving car crashes, including other negligent drivers, pedestrians, or entities responsible for unsafe road conditions. Depending on the accident’s facts, Michigan law permits multiple parties to share fault.

Manufacturer Liability vs. Driver Liability in Self-Driving Car Accidents

In Michigan, product liability may apply when a defect in a vehicle, software, or self-driving system contributes to an injury. These claims often focus on whether a design flaw, manufacturing issue, or lack of adequate warnings played a role in causing the crash and resulting injuries.

Personal liability applies when a human driver fails to properly operate or supervise a vehicle as required. This commonly arises in cases involving driver assistance or partial automation systems where the driver is expected to remain attentive and ready to intervene.

Two men standing by a car reviewing legal documents

Challenges of Proving Liability in Self-Driving Car Accidents

Self-driving car accident cases present unique challenges that can complicate insurance claims and liability determinations:

  • Artificial intelligence decision-making can be difficult to explain in legal proceedings.
  • Vehicle data may be lost or overwritten if it is not preserved promptly.
  • The level of automation in use at the time of the crash may be disputed.
  • Insurance policies may not clearly address risks involving autonomous technology.

These challenges often result in delayed claims or disputes with insurance companies. Matz Injury Law assists injured people by identifying responsible parties, preserving critical evidence, and addressing complex liability issues so claims can move forward under Michigan law.

Common Injuries Resulting From Self-Driving Car Accidents

Injuries from self-driving car accidents often look similar to those caused by traditional vehicle crashes. For injured people in autonomous vehicle crashes, the focus is usually on the physical harm suffered and how those injuries affect daily life, work, and recovery.

Common injuries may include:

  • Whiplash and other soft tissue injuries
  • Traumatic brain injuries
  • Broken bones and internal injuries
  • Injuries requiring ongoing medical treatment or rehabilitation

Beyond physical injuries, many accident victims also face property damage, time away from work, and long-term medical needs. These impacts are often central to insurance claims and personal injury cases under Michigan law.

How Do Courts Handle Cases Involving Self-Driving Car Accidents?

Courts generally apply existing personal injury law frameworks when handling self-driving car accident cases. Judges and juries review evidence such as:

  • Vehicle data and system logs
  • Expert testimony explaining how the technology functioned
  • Compliance with applicable safety regulations
  • Statements and representations made by manufacturers

As with many personal injury cases in Michigan, most self-driving car accident claims resolve through settlement rather than trial, particularly when liability and damages can be established through evidence.

How Auto Insurance Applies to Self-Driving Cars

Self-driving technology has begun to affect how auto insurance policies are written and applied. Depending on the vehicle and how it is used, auto insurance may involve:

  • Personal auto insurance for vehicles operating at lower levels of automation
  • Commercial liability insurance for driverless or fleet-operated vehicles
  • Manufacturer-backed insurance programs for certain autonomous systems
  • Closer review by insurance companies when automated features are involved

In Michigan, no-fault insurance rules continue to apply regardless of whether a vehicle uses automated driving technology.

What to Do After a Self-Driving Car Crash in Michigan

After a crash involving a self-driving or automated vehicle in Michigan, taking the right steps early can help protect both your health and your legal rights:

  • Call 911 to report the crash and request medical assistance
  • Document the scene, including vehicle damage, road conditions, and any automated driving features in use
  • Collect insurance information from all involved parties
  • Seek medical care promptly, even if symptoms seem minor at first
  • Preserve vehicle data, dashcam footage, and any information related to the automated system
  • Consider speaking with a Michigan car accident lawyer before giving recorded statements to insurance companies

Because Michigan follows a no-fault system, early documentation and medical treatment are especially important when seeking personal injury protection benefits and evaluating whether additional claims may apply.

Should I Speak With a Personal Injury Lawyer After a Self-Driving Car Crash?

You may want to contact a car accident lawyer in Michigan when:

  • Injuries require ongoing or specialized medical treatment.
  • A self-driving or automated system was involved in the crash.
  • Fault or responsibility is disputed by an insurance company.
  • An insurer delays, limits, or denies benefits or coverage.

Getting legal guidance early can help protect your claim and avoid common mistakes during the recovery process.

Why Clients Choose Matz Injury Law

Matz Injury Law represents injured people across Michigan in complex car accident cases, including those involving advanced vehicle technology. Our personal injury attorneys meet with clients throughout the state and take the time to understand how an accident has affected their health, finances, and daily life. We focus on clear communication, careful investigation, and holding the appropriate parties accountable under Michigan law.

Testimonials

“Jared worked with me when I broke both my ankles at the same time. He was so efficient, friendly and attentive to my needs. He was always in contact with me and answered my calls when I needed to speak to him, or he would call me back soon after. Jared did an outstanding job and looked out for my best interest during this ordeal. I believe Jared got me the most for my injury possible. A special “thank you” to you Jared, and I will refer you to anyone that is in need of an injury lawyer. I owe you a lot of gratitude” — Lisa S.

“I had an amazing experience working with Steve and his practice. Whenever I needed any help, he was right there to help. He even came to my house to discuss my case with me when I was bedridden! His dedication, professionalism, truly made a difference. One of the best parts is he takes 22% not 33%!! I would highly recommend Matz Injury Law to anyone in need of legal assistance. Thanks again to Steve and his practice you truly made this process simple and stress free for me!” — Grant B.

“Absolutely the most amazing lawyer we could have asked for . I couldn’t thank you enough for sticking with us and helping us with everything! Jared is the guy for you ! 10/10” — Victoria T.

Frequently Asked Questions

Are Self-Driving Cars Safer Than Traditional Cars?

Federal guidance from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration indicates that some automated driving features may reduce certain types of crashes while also introducing risks related to sensors, software performance, and roadway conditions. Overall safety outcomes depend on the level of automation, system design, and operating environment.

Does Insurance Cover Self-Driving Cars?

In Michigan, no-fault auto insurance generally applies regardless of whether a vehicle uses automated driving technology. Liability coverage may vary depending on the level of automation involved and which party is responsible for the crash.

Can I Sue a Self-Driving Car Company?

Michigan law may allow claims against self-driving car manufacturers when a defect in the vehicle or its technology contributes to an injury. Whether a claim is possible depends on the facts of the accident and the available evidence.

Get Answers After a Self-Driving Car Accident in Michigan

If you were injured in a crash involving a self-driving or automated vehicle, it can be difficult to know who is responsible or what steps to take next. Michigan’s no-fault rules and emerging vehicle technology can make these cases especially confusing.

Matz Injury Law helps injured people understand how liability may apply, what benefits may be available, and how to respond when insurance companies delay or dispute claims. Call 866-226-6833 or complete our online contact form to schedule a free consultation and discuss your situation under Michigan law.

Headshot of Steven J Matz, an attorney at Matz Injury Law

Written By Steven Matz

Founding Partner

Steven J. Matz is the founder of Matz Injury Law, specializing in personal injury litigation with a focus on car accident victims. With over 40 years of legal experience, Mr. Matz has achieved numerous million-dollar settlements. He holds an AV Preeminent rating from Martindale-Hubbell and has been recognized among Michigan’s Top Attorneys. Steven J. Matz is a frequent lecturer on legal ethics and personal injury law, and serves on the Michigan Attorney Discipline Board.

Logo for Michigan Lawyers Weekly Hall of Fame featuring a star and column design.
Super Lawyers
Avvo Rating 10.0 Superb Top Attorney Lawsuits & Disputes
Michigan's Top Attorneys - Crain's Detroit Business
America's Top 100 - High Stakes Litigators
AV Preeminent - Peer Rated for Highest Level of Professional Excellence
National Trial Lawyers Top 100 Trial Lawyers
Expertise - Best Personal Injury Attorneys in Detroit 2020
America's Top 100 Attorneys

    Blog Categories

    Let’s Win Your Case Together

    Recent Resource Articles

    Stay informed and up-to-date with the latest personal injury legal insights, news, and resources from the knowledgeable team at Matz Injury Law.